May be once a task is set, a particular time could be set where all learners are expected to be online. Something within hours and not a whole day should be decided upon, to ensure that they are all there at that time. Anybody that fails to be there at the given time has already missed the chance to share and contribute to that task. Apart from that, in order to ensure that no body dodges deliberately, it should also be allocated marks. Then the participants would know that there is something to lose if they don’t appear at that time.
MANAGING THE WARMWARE
Managing the warmware is a key issue to learning. Know when the learners are to use which tools, where to access the tools, ensuring that learners do not make off with any of the tools, keeping them at the right place where their safety is assured and keeping them in good condition. The teacher also has to be in control to see that the learners are not distracted in the course of using the tech tools. In order to do this, there are a number of issues that the teacher would need to work upon and put in place. It is not a matter of doing something. There are ground rules that must be set and put in place for that to happen. The learners should also participate in setting these rules. Other things to consider would include;
· Have clear established routines
· Get everyone's attention
· State the learning objectives clearly and leave something to be discovered
· Be prepared
· Positive classroom environment
· Give credit where it is due
· Use positive criticism as well as negative criticism
· Know the learners
· Keep it real.
So far in my classes, to some extent I have practiced a bit of each one of the stated points above. I only need to introduce the use of technology tools to them. But this is still a big milestone I am yet to defeat. There are several things to take into consideration here. Amongst the most important ones are;
· The availability of the Net
· The learners' access to the technology tools
· The nature of the curriculum. etc.
True Margaret, it has always been had for all of us to be on the collaborative document at the same time.
ReplyDeleteThanks Twaha
ReplyDeleteI also agree Maggie, collaborating when we are in different parts of the course and moving at different paces will ever remain a challenge!!
ReplyDeleteTrue Prossy
DeleteThanks for the post Margaret. I don't think it is necessary to be online at the same time to collaborate on a wiki, what is necessary is to have a timeline, to know the time limit, be it a week or a month depending on the task. What is important is to use the comments or discussion section to give feedback when adding, editing or deleting content.
ReplyDeleteExactly Geoffrey. I qm talking about a timeline. Even in our collaborative tasks people have failed to be there. Take a look and tell me l am wrong.
DeleteGood observations Marg. It looks like you have no kind words for the Wiki even when it allowed you to read and think and write all at once!
ReplyDeleteThat is not the point Nellie. I very much love the wiki. It is only that it is frustrating because of the amount of time one is willing to put in to accomplish a task and the actual time one puts in.
ReplyDeleteSome tools are synchronous and are used in contexts where you want to create the feeling of being in one room. the WhatsApp groups already fulfill such a function. The wiki is collaborative and flexible for contributors. It does not in fact allow simultaneous contribution. It was specifically chosen to allow for flexibility of personal timetables within the group. Of course it was also chosen so that you could experience the pros and cons and self-regulate within the group. This is exactly what is happening here Margaret. You are quite correct to be critical of the wiki experience thus far.
ReplyDeleteThank you Gerald.
Delete